Isolierte Ganzjahres-Isomatte R-Wert 6,6

Impressed. I took this out on a two night trip hiking around Ausangate in Cusco and was very pleased with the size, comfort and most importantly, the warmth provided! This is not a small, ultralight pad. However, the weight is very good for the return and benefits provided. The carry bag works well for inflating and stays connected! but it is a bit of a workout and time consuming, especially when it's raining sideways and you want to get setup. I decided to purchase a small, rechargeable inflator and see how that works for the next adventure. Overall, I think this bag is an incredible value for anyone camping / hiking in cold weather and want to stay warm at night rather than brag about how light their pack is... ;-)

This pad is comfortable and a good size. 72" length and 25" width. That's perfect. The mat itself is crinkly but with that R value, price and insulation most pads are crinkly. I wish the valve had a function to adjust the air like most pads in this price range. It's very compact which is a major plus. The thing I absolutely hate and therefore returned this product for is the inflation procedure. Its a big mat and blowing 20 times into it isn't a good experience and the inflation bag is so tiny it doesn't do anything. I think this will be an amazing product if they add an inflation bag that most other brands use which is just a larger bag. I tried using my other inflation bag from my old pad but the atepa pad has a smaller orifice. You could also get a small pump, but for me I wanted wanted it as compact as possible and I didn't want to spend an additional $20-30 on a pump. I didn't test it in cold temperatures so I can't say how good the insulation truly is. Overall I think this is a good product just not for me.

great pad for backpacking, it is super lightweight and fits in the bag that you bring. It is super easy to setup and pack away. It also will fit most people as i am a pretty big guy and it fits me great. Also a great price point for a product like this.

A total game-changer for tent camping. It packs down smaller but provides surprisingly thick cushioning that keeps you off the hard, cold ground. The internal baffles offer great stability so you don't feel like you're sliding off in the middle of the night. It’s a night-and-day difference for your back compared to traditional foam pads.

This review is for the Atepa Thermair Pro 6.6R Updated Wide-Long pad.PROS* Great Insulation (I tested on snow)* Relatively Good Value* Thick* Relatively Quiet* Wide* Reasonable weight for the size & costCONS* Not as wide as claimed (I measured 25")* Inflation valve doesn't work well with Flextail Zero pump* Still expensive at $95, just not as ridiculous as Nemo or ThermarestI've gone through a bunch of pads over the past year or so looking for an ideal replacement for my 2017 Thermarest Neoair X-lite that got an unrepairable gash in it while I was trekking in Alaska. The price of new Neoairs (and similar brand-name pads) is out of the range of what I'm willing to spend, so I'm looking for the best deal to get the features I want: Good insulation, light weight, small packed size, wide enough for splayed out side sleeping, and good comfort.This pad popped up on my radar and had impressive specs for the cost. 6.6R value is very good. 27" width (claimed) is also wider by a couple inches than the other pads I have been using. Under 1.5 lbs is good, and a 4.3" depth is downright luxurious. The price with coupon at ~$95, while a bit more expensive than the Camdoor Ultralight 6.8R regular-wide pad I had been using, was still a lot cheaper than the name brand pads. (Note- I like the Camdoor pad and still recommend it, but this Atepa pad is not a mummy shape which gives me more room to spread my legs out when laying on my side, and is much thicker at 4.3" vs. 2.75" and weighs only a couple ounces more).I weighed everything as soon as it arrived. The pad by itself weighed 1.48lbs. With the stuff sack and patch kit it weighed 1.68lbs. I inflated the pad with the stuff sack which worked pretty well. To fill, you open the upper cap which exposes a port with a one-way valve to let air into the pad but not out. The valve is a bit stiff and it took a bit more effort to force the air from the inflation sack into the pad than I was expecting. It also took more force to push down on the valve to let a little bit of air out to fine-tune the firmness of the pad. To deflate the pad, open the bottom part of the valve and it lets all the air out (or in) without any valve. It thus deflates very quickly, which is nice compared to the Camdoor which has a flapper over the hole that you have to manually hold open while deflating the pad.The stiffness of the one-way valve ended up causing a problem for my Flextail Zero inflation pump. The pump does not create enough pressure to overcome the force required to open the valve, so I could not use it on that valve. I had to open the deflation port and put the pump there to inflate the pad with it. This works until the pad is full and you need to take the pump off. Because the deflation port has no valve or flapper, a lot of air escapes when you pull the pump off to close the port. I then have to put a couple more bag fulls of air in from the inflation sack to get it back to fully inflated. I may end up just using the inflation sack for this pad and skip the pump.For its maiden voyage, I took the Atepa pad out on a Winter backpacking trip. I decided to give it a real test and not bring a foam pad to put underneath to add some extra insulation to the tent floor that was pitched in snow. I can report that the pad did great on snow with temperatures down to 20F. I didn't feel any heat being sucked out through the pad as I have with other pads, such as the Gear Doctor Apolloair. The rectangular shape was good, though I overlaid the 25" wide Camdoor pad on it and they were the exact same width at the widest part, so I don't know where the 27" width they put in the marketing info is coming from. 27" would be better than the 25". I could just feel my knees falling off the edge of the pad when I was in my typical side sleeping position. An extra inch of width on each side would have helped with that.I intentionally left the pad a little soft to have a cushier sleep and take full advantage of the 4.3" thickness. This was very comfortable for sleeping, but the downside was if I sat up and concentrated all my weight in a small area, I was bottoming out the pad on the cold, bumpy ground. If I inflated the pad more, this wouldn't have happened, so it isn't really a pad problem, but it does make me wonder if a thick pad is really necessary. I will need more experimentation and comparison to reach a conclusion on this.The pad was quiet enough that I didn't notice the noise when I roll around on it. My 2017 Neoair Xlite was much louder and I felt like I was disturbing the whole camp whenever I rolled around or shifted on it due to the crinkly insulation layers. The Atepa has much less crinkly noise.CONCLUSION: I like this pad a lot and recommend it for anyone with requirements like mine (side sleeper, willing to carry a little more weight to save a lot of money). Hopefully it will hold up to regular usage. If it fails prematurely, I will be sure to come back and update t...